Rocket Fuel Synthesis by Fisher-Tropsch Process

This study aims to investigate the feasibility of using Fisher Tropsch (FT), a commercial-scale technology that currently produces liquid fuels from syngas (CO & H2), to produce fuels that are compatible with current rocket engine systems. Front-end systems that produce syngas like carbon dioxide (CO2) sequestration or solid waste management systems can be interfaced with the FT reactor to produce fuel for a variety of habitation/space travel scenarios. While In-Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU) studies for Mars return have emphasized methane fuel, only modest work has been done to develop the methane-powered rocket engine. Developing a process that generates liquid hydrocarbons that are compatible with current engine designs is more economical than developing a methane production process, along with developing and certifying new engines that use methane. Fisher-Tropsch (FT) is a commercial-scale technology that currently produces liquid fuels from syngas (CO & H2). FT could easily produce kerosene-type products, like RP-1, therefore eliminating the need for new engines. Front-end systems that produce syngas can be interfaced with the FT reactor thus integrating ISRU with closed-loop Environmental Control and Life Support Systems (ECLSS). Development Approach: Demonstrate the feasibility of deploying the FT technology to produce RP-1 (kerosene) for a Mars return scenario and for a deep-space/lunar habitat mission. The first scenario will demonstrate integrating FT with gas-phase collection of CO2 and conversion to syngas. The second case will integrate FT with gasification to convert solid waste to syngas. Process development and equipment sizing will follow established methods used for sizing ECLSS technologies. Anticipated Outcomes: A detailed feasibility analysis along with process economics for both scenarios. The process model will specify sizing parameters for the system and the results will discuss FT with respect to other proposed ISRU technologies in order to provide a detailed perspective on process economics.

Only modest work has been done to develop the methane-powered rocket engine. Developing a process that generates liquid hydrocarbons that are compatible with current engine designs is more economical than developing a methane production process, along with developing and certifying new engines that use methane.

This is early/mid-stage (TRL 2) — the most realistic path in is NASA SBIR/STTR, which funds small businesses and research institutions to develop technology aligned with NASA's needs (equity-free, phased funding). Check whether a current SBIR/STTR solicitation topic overlaps with this project's technology area, or contact the project directly (above) to ask.

None of these are guaranteed paths for this specific project — TechPort itself doesn't have an "apply" button. Reaching out to the contact(s) above with a specific question is usually the fastest way to find out what's actually open.