Illustration of Earth with several asteroids passing at different distances, one flagged as potentially hazardous

Asteroids on 2026-10-09

← Back to history

Why is one asteroid “hazardous” when closer ones are not?

Because the flag has nothing to do with how close it came on the day. NASA marks an object a Potentially Hazardous Asteroid only if both of these are true of its orbit and its size:

  • Its orbit can bring it within 0.05 AU of Earth’s — about 7.5 million km. This is the Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance, the closest the two paths ever come, not the distance on any given pass.
  • It is big enough to matter — absolute magnitude 22.0 or brighter, which is roughly 140 metres across and up. That threshold is a planning convention, not a physical boundary: it is about the size at which an impact could do regional damage. Smaller objects are not harmless, they are simply outside this definition — the Chelyabinsk object of 2013 was around 20 metres and injured about 1,500 people with the shock wave from its airburst, without ever reaching the ground intact.

The two terms: AU — astronomical unit, the average Earth–Sun distance, 149,597,871 km. 0.05 AU is about 7.5 million km.
MOID — minimum orbit intersection distance, the closest the two orbits ever come, whatever the timing. See the glossary for NEO, PHA and H.

So a large rock passing at 39 million km today can be flagged, because on some future orbit it could come far nearer — while a pebble skimming past at 4 million km is not, because it would never reach the ground.

Three objects that all passed Earth on 30 August 2026 make the point better than any definition:

Object Size Orbit’s closest to Earth’s Missed by, that day Flagged
2013 JR28 122–272 m 5.3 M km (0.035 AU) 39.2 M km Yes — both tests pass
2012 LE11 629–1,406 m 23.3 M km (0.156 AU) 26.1 M km No — orbit never gets near enough
2007 EK 3.7–8.2 m 198,000 km (0.0013 AU) 4.2 M km No — far too small

The middle one is five times larger than the flagged one and passed closer on the day, but its path can never come within 23 million km of ours. The last one’s orbit crosses inside the Moon’s distance — nearer than any other object here — and it is still not hazardous, because at a few metres across it would burn up long before it landed.

“Potentially hazardous” is a watchlist criterion, not a prediction. None of these is on a collision course; the label means an object is worth keeping precise track of over the coming centuries.

Name Diameter (m) Hazardous Velocity (km/h) Miss distance
(2001 UP) 19.3 – 43.1
≈ the Chelyabinsk object
No 74,968
61 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 32 minutes
62,620,486 km
163 LD
(2003 QF70) 262.2 – 586.2
≈ the Burj Khalifa
No 23,097
19 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 1.7 hours
46,792,545 km
122 LD
(2015 KT121) 17.6 – 39.3
≈ the Chelyabinsk object
No 38,982
32 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 62 minutes
46,791,579 km
122 LD
(2016 UW35) 32.0 – 71.5
≈ an airliner's wingspan
No 18,012
15 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 2.2 hours
32,507,570 km
84.6 LD
(2018 VJ1) 39.1 – 87.5
≈ an airliner's wingspan
No 43,971
36 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 55 minutes
54,641,923 km
142 LD
(2019 EO2) 56.6 – 126.5
≈ a football pitch
No 71,701
58 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 34 minutes
74,515,531 km
194 LD
(2019 GE1) 10.6 – 23.7
≈ the Chelyabinsk object
No 12,911
10 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 3.1 hours
17,122,192 km
44.5 LD
routine about 57 times a year

The tag beside a distance says how often an approach at least that close, by an object of that size, appears in 127 years of this archive — a frequency rather than a percentile, because almost every close approach would score in the top few per cent and the scale would say nothing. Approaches beyond 50 lunar distances get no tag, since there is nothing useful to say about them. The counts are a floor: the archive holds the objects known today, and most of the undiscovered ones are small. The ≈ line beside a diameter compares size only. What an impact would do depends on speed, angle, composition and where it arrives, and none of that follows from width — the Chelyabinsk comparison in particular names a body remembered for its airburst, not for how wide it was.