Illustration of Earth with several asteroids passing at different distances, one flagged as potentially hazardous

Asteroids on 2026-10-17

← Back to history

Why is one asteroid “hazardous” when closer ones are not?

Because the flag has nothing to do with how close it came on the day. NASA marks an object a Potentially Hazardous Asteroid only if both of these are true of its orbit and its size:

  • Its orbit can bring it within 0.05 AU of Earth’s — about 7.5 million km. This is the Minimum Orbit Intersection Distance, the closest the two paths ever come, not the distance on any given pass.
  • It is big enough to matter — absolute magnitude 22.0 or brighter, which is roughly 140 metres across and up. That threshold is a planning convention, not a physical boundary: it is about the size at which an impact could do regional damage. Smaller objects are not harmless, they are simply outside this definition — the Chelyabinsk object of 2013 was around 20 metres and injured about 1,500 people with the shock wave from its airburst, without ever reaching the ground intact.

The two terms: AU — astronomical unit, the average Earth–Sun distance, 149,597,871 km. 0.05 AU is about 7.5 million km.
MOID — minimum orbit intersection distance, the closest the two orbits ever come, whatever the timing. See the glossary for NEO, PHA and H.

So a large rock passing at 39 million km today can be flagged, because on some future orbit it could come far nearer — while a pebble skimming past at 4 million km is not, because it would never reach the ground.

Three objects that all passed Earth on 30 August 2026 make the point better than any definition:

Object Size Orbit’s closest to Earth’s Missed by, that day Flagged
2013 JR28 122–272 m 5.3 M km (0.035 AU) 39.2 M km Yes — both tests pass
2012 LE11 629–1,406 m 23.3 M km (0.156 AU) 26.1 M km No — orbit never gets near enough
2007 EK 3.7–8.2 m 198,000 km (0.0013 AU) 4.2 M km No — far too small

The middle one is five times larger than the flagged one and passed closer on the day, but its path can never come within 23 million km of ours. The last one’s orbit crosses inside the Moon’s distance — nearer than any other object here — and it is still not hazardous, because at a few metres across it would burn up long before it landed.

“Potentially hazardous” is a watchlist criterion, not a prediction. None of these is on a collision course; the label means an object is worth keeping precise track of over the coming centuries.

Name Diameter (m) Hazardous Velocity (km/h) Miss distance
144900 (2004 VG64) 589.6 – 1318.4
≈ the Burj Khalifa
Yes 80,990
66 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 30 minutes
26,873,815 km
69.9 LD
(2002 TH68) 120.4 – 269.2
≈ the Great Pyramid
No 69,791
57 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 34 minutes
73,549,238 km
191 LD
(2005 VS) 94.7 – 211.9
≈ a football pitch
No 24,090
20 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 1.7 hours
15,738,548 km
40.9 LD
routine about 101 times a year
614134 (2008 TC4) 124.3 – 278.0
≈ the Great Pyramid
Yes 90,045
73 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 27 minutes
45,552,721 km
119 LD
(2014 JR24) 3.7 – 8.2
≈ a city bus
No 60,072
49 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 40 minutes
65,155,068 km
169 LD
(2015 HR11) 174.8 – 390.9
≈ the Great Pyramid
Yes 63,958
52 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 38 minutes
26,601,231 km
69.2 LD
(2016 LC9) 10.6 – 23.7
≈ the Chelyabinsk object
No 13,007
11 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 3.1 hours
16,990,663 km
44.2 LD
routine about 57 times a year
(2016 TQ54) 9.7 – 21.6
≈ a city bus
No 79,139
64 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 30 minutes
63,040,348 km
164 LD
(2017 MA4) 506.5 – 1132.5
≈ the Burj Khalifa
No 97,430
79 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 25 minutes
70,436,910 km
183 LD
(2018 PZ21) 12.1 – 27.2
≈ the Chelyabinsk object
No 42,636
35 times the speed of sound
round the Earth in 56 minutes
29,282,896 km
76.2 LD

The tag beside a distance says how often an approach at least that close, by an object of that size, appears in 127 years of this archive — a frequency rather than a percentile, because almost every close approach would score in the top few per cent and the scale would say nothing. Approaches beyond 50 lunar distances get no tag, since there is nothing useful to say about them. The counts are a floor: the archive holds the objects known today, and most of the undiscovered ones are small. The ≈ line beside a diameter compares size only. What an impact would do depends on speed, angle, composition and where it arrives, and none of that follows from width — the Chelyabinsk comparison in particular names a body remembered for its airburst, not for how wide it was.